

MiniMax M2 offers powerful agent-based reasoning with low-latency, high-throughput performance.
MiniMax M2 is a state-of-the-art agent-based reasoner designed for high efficiency and advanced autonomous capabilities. It leverages a Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture with 230 billion total parameters, activating 10 billion parameters per inference for optimal performance. This model excels in latency reduction and throughput, making it suitable for demanding AI applications.

vs Claude Opus: MiniMax M2 emphasizes swift, scalable agent reasoning with coding-centered capabilities, whereas Claude Opus targets maximal reasoning depth and complex multi-step problem solving with robust tool and memory integration.
vs Gemini 2.5: MiniMax M2 surpasses Gemini 2.5 Pro in overall intelligence scores, placing it among the top five models globally, and exceeds it in efficiency due to its MoE architecture activating only a small subset of parameters. Gemini 2.5 excels in multimodal creativity, generating images, art, and audio, whereas MiniMax M2 is more focused on reasoning, coding, and autonomous agent tasks.
vs PaLM 2: PaLM 2 is renowned for its multilingual, coding, and research capabilities, but MiniMax M2 outperforms it in open intelligence rankings and autonomous reasoning benchmarks. PaLM 2’s versatility makes it suitable for a wide range of applications, whereas MiniMax M2’s strength lies in cost-efficient, high-performance agent reasoning for specialized tasks.
vs GPT-4: GPT-4 remains the industry leader for multilingual understanding and a wide array of domains beyond coding and reasoning, while MiniMax M2 specifically optimizes those domains tied to autonomous agent reasoning, coding, and deep search functions.
MiniMax M2 is a state-of-the-art agent-based reasoner designed for high efficiency and advanced autonomous capabilities. It leverages a Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture with 230 billion total parameters, activating 10 billion parameters per inference for optimal performance. This model excels in latency reduction and throughput, making it suitable for demanding AI applications.

vs Claude Opus: MiniMax M2 emphasizes swift, scalable agent reasoning with coding-centered capabilities, whereas Claude Opus targets maximal reasoning depth and complex multi-step problem solving with robust tool and memory integration.
vs Gemini 2.5: MiniMax M2 surpasses Gemini 2.5 Pro in overall intelligence scores, placing it among the top five models globally, and exceeds it in efficiency due to its MoE architecture activating only a small subset of parameters. Gemini 2.5 excels in multimodal creativity, generating images, art, and audio, whereas MiniMax M2 is more focused on reasoning, coding, and autonomous agent tasks.
vs PaLM 2: PaLM 2 is renowned for its multilingual, coding, and research capabilities, but MiniMax M2 outperforms it in open intelligence rankings and autonomous reasoning benchmarks. PaLM 2’s versatility makes it suitable for a wide range of applications, whereas MiniMax M2’s strength lies in cost-efficient, high-performance agent reasoning for specialized tasks.
vs GPT-4: GPT-4 remains the industry leader for multilingual understanding and a wide array of domains beyond coding and reasoning, while MiniMax M2 specifically optimizes those domains tied to autonomous agent reasoning, coding, and deep search functions.